HOME ADVERTISE ARCHIVES LETTERS TO THE EDITOR SPPECIAL REQUESTS CONTACT US

GLEN BECK Conservative Eloquence
Glen Beck gave the keynote address at the CPAC gathering this year. Last year Rush Limbaugh had that honor. The onservative Political Action Committee is exactly what the name suggests. Conservatives gather annually to listen to speakers and discuss ways to advance the conservative agenda.
I only saw video clips of some of the speakers, but I did see Glen Beck deliver his speech on Fox News. I thought it was great. I mentioned to a friend that on his best day, with his teleprompter working perfectly, Barack Obama couldn't come close to making a speech like Beck's. Why? One reason is because Obama is seldom speaking the truth. To make things worse, he makes a speech every day and is apparently unaware of his contradictory statements to the American people. Either that or he has absolutely no shame about his lies. Beck is far from perfect in his delivery. I often find him to be just a little bizarre in his presentation. I wish that he would omit constant references to his alcoholism. Above all, I wish that when he is on camera in suit and tie doing his show we would not be able to see his sneakers.
I remind myself that Glen Beck is an entertainer. That has an impact on the
 
 
Until he began focusing on identifying what a progressive really is, many people had no idea about the positions Progressives have taken in the past. At various times liberals have found it desirable to shed the liberal label and call themselves progressives. I think that they use whatever word is less tarnished by their behavior at the time. When it comes to Progressives there is abundant historical evidence that they were and are enemies of the American form of government. Several former progressive American presidents clearly stated that they found the greatest obstacle to their ideological goals was the Constitution. Teddy Roosevelt's comments when he was president reveal an amazing similarity to those of Barack Obama. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive and so was FDR. Progressives believe in big government and feel constrained and frustrated by the Constitution. That is an ominous belief when it applies to a free America. Barack Obama is on record criticizing the Constitution because it limits what government can do. He has said that redistribution of wealth is hampered by the Constitution.
Continued on Page 3 - BECK
 
way he presents himself. The day after
his speech at CPAC William Bennett
criticized him for ignoring the Republicans who had been speaking out against the policies of Barack Obama and the Democratic Party leadership. I respect Mr. Bennett, but I think that Beck was focused more on underlining the fact that there are "progressives" in both political Parties. Glen Beck identifies the cancer that is relentlessly undermining the liberties Americans have enjoyed since the idea that is America was presented to us in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Glen Beck is very much hated by the left. He is hated with good reason. Beck exposes the truth about "Progressives."
 
Can you help?
Page 2 - THE FIRST EDITION ONLINE    
A MISSION STATEMENT
The First Edition encourages anyone and everyone with a letter or an article that they wish to share with members of the community to submit that material to us for publication. We are primarily a forum that allows different points of view to be presented to readers.
There is no question about my political orientation. I am a conservative and my writing reflects that point of view. I regret that those who disagree with my views choose not to respond to them in The First Edition. Guidelines for publication are included in every issue. We do maintain editorial authority and exclude only material that is profane or potentially libelous.

THE FIRST EDITION GUIDE LINES FOR EDITORIALS ARE:

• The First Edition will not change the wording of letters or articles submitted for publication. Profanity or potentially libelous remarks    will not be published.
• A verifiable name and address must be attached to letters.
• Submitted articles may appear on our website; www.first-edition-online.com
• Please send letters and editorials to The First Edition, P.O. Box 1116, Hamilton, MT 59840, or email them to
   editor@first-edition-online.com

____________________________________________

State Legislative Efforts to Restore
Our Constitutional Republic

The Federal Government has overreached its lawful duties as outlined in the Constitution of the United States, forcing states to adhere to rules, regulations and taxes have the right to impose, in clear and blatant violation of the 10th Amendment.   The time has come for states to take serious and effective action to resist Federal intrusion of their lawful rights and duties. First, the legislators call for the passage of a comprehensive package of 10 key pieces of legislation that will reclaim state sovereignty by nullifying regulations illegally imposed by the Federal Government. Second is to establish a "Sheriffs First" program allowing county sheriffs to reaffirm and uphold their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.   Third is to call on the people of the United States to support these efforts and to help pass such legislation in state legislatures across the nation. (The above was taken from the DeWeese Report and the American Policy Center.) These are three statements that should be presented to every person running for office in Ravalli County and the state of Montana, whether it is for State Representative, State Senator, County Commissioner or sheriff The State of Colorado is already doing some of this according to Tom Tancredo and petitions are circulating to
place the following state constitutional amendment on the Nov., 2010 ballot. Colorado Initiatve 42 reads:"The people of Colorado declare and request that all elected public officials in the state, including all state legislators, governor, attorney general, secretary of state, United States Representatives and United states Senators, oppose by all means available to them as elected officials it does not the adoption or ratification of any United Nations treaty or other binding international agreement which impairs, restricts or other binding international agreement which impairs, restricts or regulates the right to keep and bear arms protected by section 13 of this Bill of Rights."
                                                                                          Rosemarie Neuman, Grassroots for Multiple Use Board Member

   

THE FIRST EDITION ONLINE - Page 3

Continued from Page 1 - BECK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     Glen Beck makes it very clear why that is the case. He connects the dots. It doesn't matter what the left calls itself. It is what they do and what they want to do to the American system of government that is the problem. I find it particularly irritating to hear a person on the political left proudly announce that they are progressive. Of course they have bought in to the sugar coated myth that young people are fed about liberalism/progressivism.
     It happens in the schools and universities and the media. I remember an earnest young man who ran for political office a few years ago. He proudly informed people that progressives were responsible for the success of the Civil Rights struggle. He is a Democrat and totally unaware of the Democrats who abandoned the Democratic Party because they were totally committed to segregation of black Americans. Those southern
Democrats became known as Dixicrats.
    Strom Thurman (D) (SC) was a Dixicrat. So was Robert Byrd (D) (WV), who was a member of the Ku Klux Klan. How do young people come to believe that the Democratic Party stands for virtue and the American way? Public education is controlled by the left. Universities are filled with radical leftist tenured professors. Black Studies, Women's Studies, Gay, Lesbian and Transgendered Studies Departments are all under the control of radical leftists. These programs are in existence to indoctrinate students. American History has been revised and history books are written to change the society into what these people want America to be.
      Radical educators speak of social justice, a particularly repulsive notion based in Marxist ideology. It is based in the belief that all wealth, including property, should be controlled by the government. In that weird ideology government takes control of whatever wealth the individual can generate and decides how much of that wealth should be given to people who did not create wealth.
    Beck exposes the fanatical self-described Marxists/Communists that Barack Obama has chosen to advise him. By appointing them as advisors it is not necessary for them to be subjected to Congressional scrutiny. Barack Obama has surrounded himself with Communists, Muslims with ties to terrorists and radicals of every stripe. All of these people are noted for their questionable backgrounds.
    Glen Beck is hated by the political left. Beck shows video clips of the bizarre individuals Obama is affiliated with. These people are speaking on camera. That is irritating because it is irrefutable.
At CPAC Glen Beck entertained. He brought out the blackboard he uses to "connect the dots." In one example he visually connects the people who created ACORN, with its criminal activities and SEIU, the international service worker's union.

      Progressives can not stand the truth about who they      are.       They can not allow the American people to know their        history or  their plans for America. Glen Beck, sneakers with       suits  aside  provides a vital service to Americans and to        America.
       ©Gene Williams
______________________
  People, Please Vote
              America is at a crossroads. Since the great        depression there  has not been a time that America has         faced financial ruin the    way that it does today. Our        children and        grandchildren have    been left in crushing        debt.
             Voting, or possibly not voting, has gotten us to where        we are now We are in serious trouble as a nation.        November is coming. Please participate in the political        process and vote. Voting can get us out of the dismal        situation we are in now
      Gene Williams
      Editor, The First Edition

 

Page 4 - THE FIRST EDITION ONLINE

   
SPINELESS AMERICA

 

"He was a drug
abusing, intoxicated
felon with a criminal
history. I was             
amazed to hear the     
guest from the Fox     
day time line up         
criticize the woman    
who ended his             
career.                        

 
The other night I saw a program on Fox News that clarified some of my thinking about what is happening in America today. Fox has a late night show, Redeye, hosted by a man named Greg Gutfeld. It is appropriately a late night presentation staffed by Red Eye comedians, with a day time Fox employee or two from other programs as guests.
There was a section of the program in which a 911 call was replayed. The conversation was between the dispatcher and a woman calling for help. She was obviously very agitated because a man she did not know was breaking into the glass doors of her home. The sound of something slamming into the door could be heard in the background

. The woman informed the dispatcher that she had a shotgun and that if the intruder did not go away she would shoot him. Interestingly to me the dispatcher, a woman, made it clear that if shooting was necessary the law supported the resident's right to employ deadly force. That was interesting because gun control advocates work unceasingly to eliminate that right..
   She shot and killed the man. He was a drug abusing, intoxicated felon with a criminal history. I was amazed to hear the guest from the Fox day time line up (I can't remember her name) criticize the woman who ended his career. The Fox staff member criticized the distraught woman and said that she had time to escape out of the back door. As if that was not stupid enough, she then blurted out "Why didn't she wound him?"     Her comments reflected a terrible reality about today's America. A few generations of the schools implanting the idea that guns should be eliminated from our society, coupled with the idea anyone who owns a gun is potentially violent, has resulted in the irrational comments of the woman on Redeye. It is an example of how weak and confused many Americans have become.
 
For the sake of discussion consider the
possible consequences of running out of the back door. What if another person was at the back door? And the idea of running into the bathroom is ludicrous. Consider this. The home owner is to abandon her home, exiting the back oor, or run into the bathroom and give the home invader access to everything in
the house. I am reminded of the TV advertisement for Brinks/Broadview Security. A man crashes into a woman's home but the alarm goes off The hooded invader, hearing the alarm, runs away. Immediately the phone rings. A clean cut young guy calls to inform her that he is a Brinks employee and asks whether she is alright. She breathlessly tells him that a man just broke into her home. His response is "I am sending help right
now." First of all, police response time can be measured in hours in some laces. A deranged invader, violent nough to smash in a door, may not be frightened away by the sound of an larm, no matter what the response time. That this commercial has been on TV for some time now suggests that the company views potential customers as being
extremely naïve. I am forced to assume that the young woman on Redeye is also naïve. She is naïve, misinformed and consequently dangerous. She is dangerous, because she had a platform
to spread her silly notion of an appropriate response to a home invasion. She thinks it appropriate for a homeowner to abandon their home if some thug tries to kick the door in. Either that or hide in the bathroom. This is the kind of thinking resulting from a public school education in today's america.
I find it revolting.
Gene Williams
         
   

THE FIRST EDITION ONLINE - Page 5

A Symbiotic Relationship
With the Left (sort of)

When I think about having been a hard-core political Leftist for most of my life, the difficult process through the last several years of dealing with the reality of that long-term political indoctrination and self-imposed intellectual dishonesty, pretend­ing to be an independent thinker instead of the standard Leftist conformist that I and my friends were, there is the perception that knowing how the Leftist agenda actually works can help us as individuals to continue doing the right stuff for advancing our country.
While the specter of the Left undoubtedly helps to keep us on our toes, to minimize any tendency toward becoming cor­rupt, (a universal human tendency, it seems) provide an ongoing example of what doesn't work in the political/economic arena, and to give us creative energy for solving our problems... it pro­vides enemies to fight against that would, if they had their way, create a political environment that is regressive, and historically destructive.
But when, as rarely happens, a situation arises whereby we as a people are in serious danger of losing our liberty and way of life, with most of the freedoms that we take for granted com­ing under siege, then we must use that
threat (from the Left) for motivation to once again diminish their power over us, put them in their place and restore the country to its historically successful mode of operation.

 

We will, as we are now doing with major grass-roots action, react positively with resolve in the best interest of a vast majority of the people, come together to make it happen and begin to change the dangerous shift in power that has been happening in basic and varied ways over a long period of time. This power shift has happened bit-by-bit from the inside of all our major institutions. As far as I can tell, this is not an example of political (or cultural) evolu­tion, as people of the Left would have us believe, but a long-term cynical power grab. What we are seeing here is enormously dangerous for us as individuals and for our country.

A perfect example of this process has to do with the national problems of health care. The legislation that is being pushed by what I call a traditional Chicago style gangsterism, against our majority's

Text Box:

 

desire, is not about health care...it's all about control. Without the Left pushing its plan of control on every level by the State, (having taken power since 2006 and especially since November, 2008) being in our face and awakening the slumber­ing and indulgent giant which is us, we probably would not have been motivated as individuals and as a people to begin solving our real health care problems and to begin the rapid dismantling of the present historically unprecedented, destructive administra­tion...within the solid Constitutional guidelines that have been there for us from the beginning.
So thank you (sort of) to Leftist America for trying so desperately and relentlessly to bring us to our knees...and for awakening us to the danger that you have always, in one form or another, tried to impose on us.
When Crocodile Dundee was deal­ing with a life and death situation fac­ing evil people in the wilds of Australia, his girlfriend said, in her moment of fear and concern, "Mick, this is not a game!" And he said, "It is to me."
And of course, we who watched that scene know how difficult it was (and is) to triumph over the evil of the mo­ment, but also that we, like our hero, must never shrink from those moments. Otherwise we're dead already...and that's a critical part of the game.

Pete MacLachlan, Stevensville, MT

Page 6 - THE FIRST EDITION ONLINE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOLERANCE VS
INTOLERANCE


The cultural left, i.e. secular humanists have discovered a way to stifle intelligent discussion with conservative moral people: They invoke the doctrine of moral relativism!
A requisite to tolerance is disagreement. But toleration demands objective truth. Intolerance is being passed off by many as a virtue. The bottom line is relativism has reached its nadir, ending up abso­lutely bankrupt as a moral philosophy. The dirty little secret revealed by Gene Edward Vieth in a recent "World" magazine article is: "The relativism of secular liberalism is only relativist when it is resisting traditional Judeo-Christian morality." Can we correctly assume that secularists, in casting their moral absolutes end up using unexamined assumptions or presuppositions cast in concrete in their world view?
Sixty plus years ago columnist Dorothy Parker stated: "Tolerance is an ugly word." I've never forgotten that.
Remember this: 1. Tolerance is a wonderful practice if it isn't used to mute absolutes (as it is done now.) 2. Acceptance is a virtue if it doesn't mean endorsing corruptness and vile behavior.
Or should we abide by the left's 11th Commandment:
THOU SHALT NOT TOLERATE THOSE INTOLERANT CHRISTIANS?
Bruce King

 
   

THE FIRST EDITION ONLINE - Page 7

That's my story and I'm sticking to it!
•••• But I could be wrong

The Easter Season is nearly here. A renewed spirituality may awaken in us. Time to think of those who may be less fortunate than ourselves. They need our prayers, so remember .......someplace..... there is a MISTER Pelosi!
Nancy and Harry, main proponents of the National Health Bill, along with our own Senator Max, need to be advised that there is no vaccine for arrogance, defiance,  stupidity and selective hearing!
There is a saying that, "You are what you eat." There is another; "You are what you step in." Let's go with Number 2. It not only applies nationally, but to local politics, as well. The three Commissioners who selected the least qualified applicant for the Ravalli County Board of Health were asked their reasoning. The two la­dies responded in a timely manner. Forty five days (and counting) have passed with still no response from Rokosch-B'Gosh. Granted, he may not have been in the office long enough to get the 28 January email. The others did. His commission

 

attendance history has more holes than a screen door. Rokosh is just not up to the job of representing the folks and main­taining dialogue with them. He may not yet have come to the realization he was selected and elected as a FOB puppet. His, and their, term in the Commission will end this year, as he is replaced. Best wishes on another line of work.
Former Commissioner, Alan Thomp­son, has written some very factual
and candid comments in recent Letters to the Editor, in which he relates a few observations and positions during his ten year service in that office. Check it out.
With the 15 March filing date for po­litical offices now passed, things will begin to shake out. County Democrats have no contested primaries. Local Republicans are not that organized, as usual, but will make substantial gains. Take that to the bank. Libertarians and Constitutionalists are scattered intermittently throughout the political process like coprolites.
Politics in Washington D.C. continues

 

to make the sleaze news with the antics of the Party of the Gay and Horny politi­cians. Elton John and Tiger Woods could be Party Chairmen. John Edwards, Bill Clinton, Barney Frank, and Congress­man (Tickle Me Elmo) Massa. Ring a bell? The electors of this nation should do better.
A certain paranoia regarding Question 9 on the 2010 U. S. Census has surfaced. Concern comes from the same folk that have seen Black Helicopters passing silently overhead on dark and stormy nights. These folk appear to think there is some kind of conspiracy behind the race or ethnic background question. It did
not bother me, personally. I admit be­ing gullible and naïve, but not with this. However, recent government actions are programming the public to be suspicious. BarackO ran on a platform of transparen­cy. That has come to pass. More people now see clearly thru him, each new day.
Dave Hurtt

THE FIRST EDITION is now being mailed to subscribers.